Re: My new take on FT130287 & BY38401 (Westmeath A5902+)
Posted: Mon, 2022-Jan-03 1:45 am
Chris,
Amazing research, as always.
The Delbna and the Sogáin are both very elusive to me. The Delbna supposedly broke into 8 different groups and the most believable origin story is they descended from Cas, the progenitor of the Dál gCais. IDK if anyone has looked into the Y-DNA to verify any connection among the Delbna; particularly if they are part of the R1b-FGC5659 clade that is associated with the Dál gCais.
However, I CAN say that the Sogáin genealogy has been badly broken by the Y-DNA. The leading Sogáin family of Connacht is the Ó Mainnín/Mannion. But they are strongly represented in the R1b-FGC5939 clade, which is VERY Uí Briúin. I think later historians have fallen victim to the old Irish practice of naming a territory after the known original settlers/proprietors of the territory and referring to it by that name thereafter, regardless of who the later settlers/proprietors were. And because the territorial name stuck, the later settlers/proprietors were misassociated with the earliest settlers/proprietors that the territory was named after.
So the medieval Delbna and Sogáin around Delvin could actually be Uí Briúin Bréifne, genetically. I think there is a lot of Irish history that has been conflated and confused in this fashion. There is a lot of work ahead to untangle it all. Thankfully, the larger part seems to be straightforward and serves as a sanity check on the rest.
Amazing research, as always.
The Delbna and the Sogáin are both very elusive to me. The Delbna supposedly broke into 8 different groups and the most believable origin story is they descended from Cas, the progenitor of the Dál gCais. IDK if anyone has looked into the Y-DNA to verify any connection among the Delbna; particularly if they are part of the R1b-FGC5659 clade that is associated with the Dál gCais.
However, I CAN say that the Sogáin genealogy has been badly broken by the Y-DNA. The leading Sogáin family of Connacht is the Ó Mainnín/Mannion. But they are strongly represented in the R1b-FGC5939 clade, which is VERY Uí Briúin. I think later historians have fallen victim to the old Irish practice of naming a territory after the known original settlers/proprietors of the territory and referring to it by that name thereafter, regardless of who the later settlers/proprietors were. And because the territorial name stuck, the later settlers/proprietors were misassociated with the earliest settlers/proprietors that the territory was named after.
So the medieval Delbna and Sogáin around Delvin could actually be Uí Briúin Bréifne, genetically. I think there is a lot of Irish history that has been conflated and confused in this fashion. There is a lot of work ahead to untangle it all. Thankfully, the larger part seems to be straightforward and serves as a sanity check on the rest.
